If there really is a “massive flu outbreak” – as all the mainstream news sources are telling us there is – is it a result of the flu vaccine’s failure? Is it fair to blame every outbreak on unvaccinated people (with superior immune systems)? Or is there some other reason? The news anchors always blame every outbreak on the unvaccinated, but cogent arguments that question the flu vaccine’s effectiveness can be made given what we know of the vaccine’s faulty design (explained below), along with the CDC’s long history of feeding us more PR than science regarding the flu vaccine. Worse, and what must carry real weight in any argument questioning the flu shot’s effectiveness, is this: most cases reported as “the flu” are not the flu at all. Did you know that only 10 to 30 percent of flu-like respiratory illnesses at any point in a given flu season are actually caused by influenza type A or B, which is what the flu shot is supposed to prevent?
Related: Shingles Vaccine Lawsuit
Flu Vaccine Industry Threatened by Science
This will sound insane, but it’s true, and no less a publication than the British Medical Journal has admitted it: The flu we thought we knew is usually not the flu. This fact has been found by examining hundreds of thousands of people diagnosed with “the flu.” The implications of that threaten the entire multi-billion-dollar flu shot industry, along with international drug cartels (legal in name only) like Merck (which also makes the dubious shingles vaccine) and GlaxoSmithKline. These Big Pharma behemoths and other drug companies have partnered with the CDC as well as U.S. politicians to sell us all the flu vaccine, at a cost of well over a billion dollars a year. Over the last several decades, the U.S. Government has spent billions of our tax dollars on what may well be less-than-worthless, yet always potentially injurious, flu vaccines.
Flu Bombshell: Flu Vaccines Spread The Flu
The Emotional Shot
The convoluted flu shot scandal cannot be explained in a palatable, Twitter-friendly sound bite; so most people will fail to read the fine print, just like most ignore the litany of those so-called “side effects” muttered at the end of a drug commercial. Images of happy people playing flash in the mind, direct to the heart, to the emotional center, the reptilian hindbrain long on fear (and anger) and short on creative solutions. Better not to listen too attentively, or look too closely. Better to let the emotions short-circuit the reasoning faculties, present the purest path to persuasion.
We accept the pretty pictures and ignore the muttered warnings at our peril. 100,000 people die every year from prescription drugs. The number injured from vaccinations is much higher, according to the Vaccine Adverse Reports System (VAERS), which all experts know records adverse events from a mere 1-10% of the actual total. Those who don’t sicken or drop dead in an obviously causal manner following vaccination may instead be struck with chronic illness, as nasty vaccine contents (ie. aluminum, mercury, formaldehyde, etc.) add a heavy load to the human body’s already toxic burden.
Unvaccinated Kids Healthier than Vaccinated Ones
Vaccines can and do harm people, and the proof is in the pudding: a new study has proven unvaccinated children are healthier than vaccinated ones. One would also be wise to read about an actual non-vaccinated control group: Where are the Autistic Amish?
Flu Vaccine Causes Flu
Dr. Oz and Piers Morgan proved on national television that the flu “vaccine” causes the flu. Using Mr. Morgan as a guinea pig, the TV doctor had attempted to show us all that one cannot get the flu from the vaccine. Mr. Morgan rolled up his sleeve on TV and Dr. Oz “inoculated” him with the influenza virus. And then God himself intervened. In a matter of days, the experiment wildly backfired. It succeeded only in revealing the larger truth, that the vaccine not only does not prevent the flu; the vaccine can and does cause the flu, or at least malicious symptoms which mimic “the flu.”
When the Flu is not the Flu
The term “the flu” always deserves quotation marks, because it turns out that what we usually call the flu is not the flu at all. It turns out that some 84% of people who were diagnosed with the flu did not have the flu at all.
Writing in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) online, Dr. Peter Doshi pulls back the CDC wizard’s curtain to reveal a monstrous fraud at work. Dr. Doshi explains that hundreds of thousands of respiratory samples are taken from flu patients every year in the U.S. and tested in labs. Of these “flu” samples, only a small percentage show the presence of an actual influenza virus.
Marketing Vaccines by Marketing Disease
Here’s the exact quote from Dr. Peter Doshi’s BMJ review, “Influenza: marketing vaccines by marketing disease” (BMJ 2013; 346:f3037):
“…[E]ven the ideal influenza vaccine, matched perfectly to circulating strains of wild influenza and capable of stopping all influenza viruses, can only deal with a small part of the ‘flu’ problem because most ‘flu’ appears to have nothing to do with influenza. Every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory specimens are tested across the US. Of those tested, on average 16% are found to be influenza positive.”
(Cough, fever, chills, sore throat, muscle aches, weakness – all the basic flu symptoms can be caused by many factors that have nothing to do with a flu virus.)
Flu Vaccine Policies Based on Fiction
Dr. Doshi told the British Medical Journal that health officials “risk losing credibility by continuing to promote the fiction that mandatory influenza vaccine policies are based on solid evidence. They are not, and it is time for healthcare institutions to do their own rigorous assessment of the evidence rather than continue this dangerous game of follow the leader.”
Sixteen Percent! (16%) Actually Have the Flue
This means that most Americans diagnosed by doctors with flu have no flu virus in their bodies. This means that most people who believe they have the flu, or who have been told by their doctors that they have the flu, do not have the flu. (You can’t make this stuff up.)
As Jon Rappoport writes in nomorefakenews.com, “[E]ven if you assume the flu vaccine is useful and safe, it couldn’t possibly prevent all those ‘flu cases’ that aren’t flu cases.” That means the so-called “flu vaccine” could not possibly work.
Flu Vaccine 10% Effective
Health officials admit that this year’s flu vaccine is only 10% effective, yet they recommend you take the shot anyway. (Seriously? Seriously.) The shot is even less effective for the elderly, and has been so for the last several years, but that’s another fact you rarely, if ever, read or hear in the mainstream media putsch for total flu vaccine compliance. (Did you know some doctors are bonused by some insurance companies if they talk a certain percentage of their patients into vaccine compliance?) Elderly people taking the yearly flu shot also raise their risk of Alzheimer’s, likely because aluminum in the shot has been implicated in Alzheimer’s disease. Children who take the flu shot are drastically more likely to suffer in any pandemic because the flu shot compromises their developing immune systems. Any Science 101 class presented by any teacher with any basic understanding of biology would teach us that the flu shot does not strengthen the immune system; it weakens it, leaving any body tainted with the toxic flu vaccine cocktail at greater risk of contracting the disease du jour.
Virus Mutates in Chicken Eggs
Mr. Rappoport explains that this year’s flu vaccine is ineffective because of chicken eggs. Researchers have discovered that the flu virus placed in the vaccine mutates in chicken eggs. So by the time a person submits to the flu shot, she’s not being protected against this year’s seasonal flu virus. She’s being protected against a mutated virus that isn’t causing the flu this year. There’s a whole lot more to the story, of course – there always is with the “science” behind vaccination – but vaccines have been made using chicken eggs for the past 70 years. That means the flu vaccine has been ineffective for at least the last 70 years or so. That means the flu vaccine has NEVER worked as advertised.
The CDC’s Rank Dishonesty (Lying by any other name)
The CDC continues to push for mass vaccination by using the same basic tactic drug companies use to sell their dubious drugs: instill fear in the target. In December 2005, the British Medical Journal online published another shocking report from Dr. Peter Doshi. It’s one that should have put the Centers for Disease Control out of business, because CDC “experts” used to tell the press that the flu killed 36,000 Americans every year.
US Flu Deaths more PR than Science
Dr. Doshi’s report was titled, “Are US flu death figures more PR than science?” (BMJ 2005; 331:1412). He wrote:
“[According to CDC statistics], ‘influenza and pneumonia’ took 62,034 lives in 2001 – 61,777 of which were attributable to pneumonia and 257 to flu, and in only 18 cases was the flu virus positively identified.”
Did we read that right?
Like rolling a small pea under shuffling walnut shells, the CDC used a street-hustler’s sleight of hand to create one overall category that combines both flu and pneumonia deaths. What? Why? For what purpose? For whose benefit? (Most decidedly not ours.) The CDC did it because they duplicitously and disingenuously make the absurd assumption that the pneumonia deaths are complications stemming from the flu. It’s a glaring nonsensical non sequitur if ever there was one, because pneumonia has many causes.
18 Flu Deaths per Year (maybe), NOT 36,000
More pointedly, of all the flu and pneumonia deaths rolled into one big phony ball in a street hustler’s crooked game, a mere 18 revealed the presence of an influenza virus.
Therefore, the CDC could not say, with any assurance whatsoever, that more than 18 people died of influenza in 2001. Total deaths from the flu was NOT 36,000. It was 18. Eighteen deaths.
Average of 1,350 flu deaths per year; NOT 36,000
Dr. Doshi continued his assessment of the CDC’s published flu-death statistics, in figures for flu separated out from pneumonia: “Between 1979 and 2001, [CDC] data show an average of 1348 [flu] deaths per year (range 257 to 3006).”
This death toll is obviously far shy of the old 36,000 figure, and we don’t know how many of those flu deaths followed vaccination, or whether some or most of those 1,350 per year had been vaccinated. This is one of the many glaring examples which shows the CDC actively engaged in promoting vaccination at the expense of the truth, and of our health, our lives.
And when you add the sensible condition that lab tests have to actually find the flu virus in patients, the numbers of flu deaths plummet even further.
Cochrane: Widespread Manipulation on Influenza Vaccines
The Cochrane Collaboration reviewed all relevant data on flu vaccines. It concluded that there was considerable bias in prestigious journals towards studies funded by the very industry profiting from mass influenza vaccination. Cochrane found that influenza vaccine data was skewed by “widespread manipulation of conclusions.” The Cochrane Collaboration concluded with a warning in all caps with bold letters. Cochrane concluded, somewhat shockingly, by admitting that even their own bleak conclusions about the flu vaccine were shy of the real mark, given the bias in reporting from industry. It seems clear now that only industry bias keeps the whole flu shot scam afloat, like a cuttlefish squirting ink to hide from all those who would see it for what it is. The Cochrane Collaboration concluded its bleak influenza vaccine review with huge caveats.
This review includes 15 out of 36 trials funded by industry (four had no funding declaration). An earlier systematic review of 274 vaccine influenza studies published up to 2007 found industry funded studies were published in more prestigious journals and cited more than other studies independently from methodological quality and size. Studies funded from public sources were significantly less likely to report conditions favorable to the vaccines. The review showed that reliable evidence on influenza vaccines is thin but there is evidence of widespread manipulation of conclusions and spurious notoriety of the studies. The content and conclusions of this review should be interpreted in light of this finding.”
Is there really a Massive Flu Outbreak? Lies unravel Scandal
Flu vaccine promotion is long on fear and short on science, as the CDC – like the drug companies with which it partners – serves not U.S. citizens but some other agenda. Few in their right mind would submit to a flu shot if they knew just how dishonest the CDC has been in protecting our health, and how the flu shot has likely never worked as advertised and promoted by an unwavering propaganda campaign from the CDC and its pharmaceutical partners in mass vaccination.