Thank you for contacting Matthews and Associates. Our office is currently closed while the city is working to recover from the effects of Hurricane Beryl, and it may take longer than usual to address your inquiries and calls. We appreciate your patience.
Skip to Content
Matthews & Associates Matthews & Associates

Physiomesh Lawsuit

Ethicon withdraws Physiomesh

Ethicon withdrew its Physiomesh in May 2016 after independent studies revealed high rates of complications associated with it. Previous high rates of patient and surgeon complaints had failed to convince Ethicon that Physiomesh needed to be removed from the market.

Physiomesh Plastic for Hernia Repair  

Physiomesh for hernia repair is made from polypropylene / plastic. Ethicon has already been fighting back lawsuits for years involving its transvaginal or pelvic mesh products. These are also made of polypropylene / plastic. Ethicon continues to deny the life-threatening complications that polypropylene / plastic can cause in the human body.

FDA Clearance of Ethicon’s Physiomesh

The FDA originally cleared Ethicon’s Physiomesh on April 9, 2010, via the FDA’s 510(k) approval process.  This truncated program allowed Ethicon to avoid rigorous pre-market research and studies. Ethicon claimed its Physiomesh was substantially similar to the company’s Proceed hernia patch. Ethicon submitted a modified version of the Physiomesh for FDA 510(k) approval June 12, 2014. The FDA approved a second model of the Physiomesh on October 23, 2014. However, FDA noted 510(k) approval did not mean that the Physiomesh complied with any Federal statutes, regulations, acts, the FDA or any other regulatory agencies. Consequently, a company using 510(k) “approval” (really only clearance, in this case) does not have the liability protection afforded by the 1976 Device Act. That Draconian legislation continues to give most medical device makers virtual immunity from liability when they make defective or dangerous medical devices that hurt people.


We may file or settle a claim individually or as part of a group on a case-by-case basis. 

Whether your claim is filed individually or as part of a group fighting the same defendant, our goal is always to provide each of our clients with individual attention.

Polypropylene / Plastic

Ethicon uses polypropylene / plastic for the base layer of the Physiomesh. This plastic is the same stuff Ethicon uses for its troublesome transvaginal mesh and bladder slings. Ethicon has faced thousands of lawsuits over its plastic transvaginal mesh and bladder slings. Ethicon added an absorable film coating to each side of the plastic to create the Physiomesh. This coating, made of different compounds, is meant to prevent the destruction plastic causes when it contacts human tissue.  Human tissue and plastic don’t naturally “mesh,” however. There has never been a plastic made that doesn’t offgass chemicals and break down. Everything in this world eventually breaks down and/or disintegrates to its base elements.

Physiomesh Market Withdrawal

Ethicon released an urgent field safety notice May 25, 2016. The company advised doctors to stop using the Physiomesh for hernia repair. However, Ethicon and Johnson & Johnson continue to deny Physiomesh was recalled. The FDA website today still does not list Physiomesh as recalled.

Medical Studies Underway

Medical studies in progress are investigating the rates of hernia recurrence and additional surgeries following Physiomesh surgery. These studies have likely found high rates of Physiomesh complications. Why else would Ethicon have withdrawn the Physiomesh from the market?

Ethicon Admits Physiomesh Problems. . . sort of

Ethicon admitted in the withdrawal notice that complications associated with the Physiomesh were possibly related to its specific characteristics, though the company claimed it could not identify any specific problem with the Physiomesh. Ethicon also admitted it was unable to instruct doctors in how to prevent hernia recurrences and complications when they used Physiomesh.

Continue Reading Read Less

Scientific Articles on Ethicon’s Physiomesh

  • August 2016

    Tissue Integration and Inflammatory Reaction in Full-Thickness Abdominal Wall Repair Using an Innovative Composite

    Compared with two other composite hernia mesh products, Physiomesh resulted in the development of more seromas and less tissue integration than the other studied hernia mesh products.

  • June 2016

    Outcomes of Bridging Versus Mesh Augmentation in Laparoscopic Repair of Small and Medium Midline Ventral Hernias.

    A study comparing various techniques to close a hernia defect with Physiomesh. Many patients experienced hernia recurrence regardless of the implanting technique.

  • March 2016

    Comparison of Two Different Concepts of Mesh and Fixation Technique in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

    25 patients implanted with Physiomesh were compared with 25 patients implanted with Ventralight. Within six (6) months of hernia mesh implantation, 20% of those implanted with Physiomesh had experienced a hernia recurrence. None of those implanted with Ventralight experienced a hernia recurrence.

  • August 2015

    Long-Term Evaluation of Adhesion Formation and Foreign Body Response to Three New Meshes.

    Physiomesh was compared with two other new hernia mesh products. Physiomesh demonstrated significantly lower incorporation strengths than the other hernia mesh products. Fractioning of the the Physiomesh coating was also observed over time, which lead to scar plate formation, but little to no abdominal wall adherence.

  • October 2014

    Biaxial Analysis of Synthetic Scaffolds for Hernia Repair Demonstrates Variability in Mechanical Anisotropy, Non-Linearity and Hysteresis.

    The mechanical properties 13 hernia mesh products were evaluated, including Physiomesh. Significant differences were observed depending on which mesh was implanted and how it was secured. The authors noted that hernia mesh materials are currently utilized as if they are uniform and interchangeable, when that is simply not the case. Additional instructions and training from Ethicon could have resulted more successful hernia repairs.

  • October 2013

    Ventralight ST and SorbaFix Versus Physiomesh and Securestrap in a Porcine Model.

    Five (5) animals were implanted with Physiomesh and five (5) animals were implanted with Ventralight. Animals implanted with Physiomesh exhibited significantly more inflammation, fibrosis, and hemorrhage.

C-Qur Hernia Mesh Problems

After Ethicon withdrew Physiomesh, the Getinge Group (parent company of Atrium Medical Corporation) sent a letter to doctors to promote their the use of Atrium’s C-Qur Hernia Mesh. Atrium has already faced several lawsuits from the FDA and consumers regarding the C-Qur hernia mesh.

Physiomesh Complications

The Physiomesh has been linked to high rates of bowel obstructions, seromas, infections, mesh failures. The hernia recurrence rate is high with the Physiomesh due to poor incorporation and mesh tearing too easily. Subsequent surgeries are often required due to complications from the defective Physiomesh, according to lawsuit petitions filed against Ethicon.

Physiomesh Defective Design

Ethicon has been aware from the beginning that its Physiomesh was defectively designed and dangerous to implant. Physiomesh’s coating, thick on both sides, is supposed to prevent the bowel from being exposed to the plastic / polypropylene. Plastic will essentially stick to any tissue in the human body. If the polypropylene sticks to the bowel, it can cause severe injuries. However, if no polypropylene is exposed, the mesh will not properly incorporate or “mesh” into the abdominal wall. When it fails to properly “mesh,” the plastic material floats and migrates in the patient’s abdomen.

Physiomesh also uses a lighter weight plastic than Ethicon’s previous hernia meshes. A “lightweight” polypropylene mesh means less plastic was used to make the product. Mesh makers started using less plastic in hopes of cutting down complications. But the “lightweight” polypropylene / plastic is much weaker than the old “heavyweight” mesh material. As a result, the Physiomesh has torn apart inside of many patients.

  • “They treat you with respect. They support you when needed.”

    Matthews and Associates is one of a kind. They treat you with respect. They support you when needed. Plus they have locations in Texas and California with wonderful customer service. Billingual service always available.

    - Sorangel T.
  • “Very informative and professional.”

    Very informative and professional. Answer thoroughly all my questions and concerns.

    - Lydia C.
  • “Matthews and Associates are very informative. Kept me up to date on what was happening with my case.”

    Matthews and Associates are very informative. Kept me up to date on what was happening with my case. They were always polite when they were talking to me. Very professional and polite.

    - Ron S.
  • “Very professional from the beginning”

    Very professional from the beginning. always answered questions and had amazing follow through on insuring data submitted was accurate

    - Jeffrey E.
  • “I am impressed that the Firm is always available and answers questions promptly”

    I've been working with Matthews and Associates for 2 years. I am impressed that the Firm is always available and answers questions promptly. I am very satisfied with the services they provide and would recommend them.

    - Kweli Y.
  • “I Love these guys!!!! They are SO Helpful, Kind, Knowledgeable,”
    I Love these guys!!!! They are SO Helpful, Kind, Knowledgeable, Smart, good with people, answer ALL ur questions, if they don't know the answer, it sure doesn't take them long to get you the answer!!!!!!!!!! I wouldn't want anyone else to handle my suit. They are AWESOME!!!!!!!!!
    - Genie S.

Ethicon Physiomesh Device Tag

Ask for device tags and operative reports when requesting your own medical records from the hospital. The device tags are needed to prove which hernia mesh was implanted in you. The operative report often uses a more generic name for the hernia mesh. So many new hernia meshes constantly hit the market that many surgeons can’t even recall which one they are implanting. Device tags can consequently be difficult to find.

Device tags are also known as the “Product Traceability Label.” The device tags note that Ethicon is the maker of the Physiomesh.

Ethicon withdraws Physiomesh

Johnson and Johnson’s subsidiary Ethicon withdrew all LOT numbers of the Physiomesh from the market. Matthews & Associates Law Firm Physiomesh recall lawyers are reviewing injuries associated with all Physiomesh LOT numbers.

 Continue Reading Read Less

Physiomesh: Ethicon Hernia Mesh Lawsuit

Please call us to speak to one of our trained hernia mesh team members. An attorney and a medical professional will look over your Physiomesh case and let you know what they believe the best course of action is for you. Matthews & Associates prosecutes each hernia mesh claim on an individual lawsuit, not as a class action. The specific facts of your lawsuit will determine if your lawsuit is compensable and to what amount. 

Matthews & Associates represents hernia mesh victims nationwide. All case evaluations and consultations are Free and Confidential. Call (888) 923-7001 or email us for an Ethicon Physiomesh lawsuit evaluation.

Matthews & Associates We Fight for Your Rights, And We Get Results

Nationwide Legal Representation

  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.
  • By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your request & other information using automated technology. Message frequency varies. Msg & data rates may apply. Text STOP to cancel. Acceptable Use Policy