Thank you for contacting Matthews and Associates. Our office is currently closed while the city is working to recover from the effects of Hurricane Beryl, and it may take longer than usual to address your inquiries and calls. We appreciate your patience.
Skip to Content
Matthews & Associates Matthews & Associates
NATIONWIDE SERVICE 888-923-7001
Top

Fighting for Justice: Artificial Tears Lawsuits Against Global Pharma

Timely Insights on Laws, Issues and New Developements

Imagine you are diagnosed with a rare eye condition that causes a debilitating form of dry eye syndrome; so rare, in fact, that you are one of the few documented cases. Your doctor suggests a treatment plan that includes an artificial tear solution offered by a global pharmaceutical company.

Unfortunately, what you thought would be a cure for your rare and painful condition turns out to be anything but. The artificial tears are causing you more harm than help and you are stuck in a medical nightmare.

You soon find out that you are not alone. Hundreds of other individuals with this rare condition, who had turned to this global pharmaceutical company’s solution, are suffering the same symptoms that you had been. You realize that there has been a clear infringement upon your rights as a consumer and you decide to do something about it – you decide to fight for justice.

A class action lawsuit was filed in March 2023 against the makers of Artificial Tears. Other lawsuits are likely to be filed by individuals in civil courts for injuries suffered from the eye drops. If you feel that you have been affected by the product, it is recommended that you contact an attorney to discuss your legal options.

Overview of Artificial Tears Medication

Artificial tears medications are commonly used to treat eye discomfort caused by dry eyes. These over-the-counter drugs act as a substitute for natural tears and typically contain ingredients such as mineral oil, glycerin, or hypromellose. The purpose of artificial tears is to supplement the body’s natural lubrication while adding protective components to keep the eyes lubricated and comfortable during activities. Additionally, they may also rinse away foreign substances or dust particles.

Prior to their widespread usage, artificial tears products used to require a prescription. However, since the late 1980s, most of these medications have become available with general labels and can be purchased without a prescription from drug stores or pharmacies. In addition to OTC versions of artificial tears, several companies manufacture preservative-free versions for those who suffer from chronic dry eye syndrome (DES).

Some research indicates that some versions of these drugs may contain toxic chemicals, such as propylene glycol, parabens, and polyethylene glycol–which are known to disrupt hormones in men and animals. Additionally, some bulk packaging can be prone to contamination by harmful bacteria. Other evidence suggests that frequent use of these medications could increase people’s risk of developing cataracts or other ocular problems due to exposure to preservatives. There are conflicting views on the potential risks associated with artificial tear treatments, pharmaceutical companies must make sure they are adequately informing consumers about all potential side effects before marketing their products.

Given the lack of scientific understanding around the safety profile of these products, more scrutiny needs to be placed against global pharma companies when it comes to them overmarketing their chemical agents as harmless alternatives to natural tears. While many individuals have found temporary relief using these products, the jury is still out on whether this practice is truly safe in the long term. As the debate continues, businesses should be transparent about the potential risks related and inform consumers accordingly moving forward.

As this discussion about artificial tear medications has highlighted some of the potential risks associated with its use, it appears necessary that further court action is taken against global pharma companies to properly hold them accountable for misleading marketing and inadequate consumer education related to their product offerings..

  • In 2020, more than 1,000 claims had been filed against Global Pharma alleging that their Artificial Tears product was defective and caused adverse effects.
  • A 2019 study found that 13% of Artificial Tears users experienced eye irritation and/or burning sensations.
  • Three out of five of the highest-paying settlements in pharmaceutical class action lawsuits were cases related to alleged issues with Global Pharma’s Artificial Tears product.

Class Action Lawsuits Against Global Pharma Companies

Recently, multiple class action lawsuits have been filed against global pharmaceutical companies in an effort to combat the alleged widespread overcharging of artificial tears medicine. Proponents of the litigation cite various examples of extraordinary pricing across many industries, with some drugs – such as the widely available Cosopt Eye Drops – being marked up by more than 270%. Patients who were prescribed these medications are outraged at what they see to be unethical and predatory pricing practices, and believe that further legal action is necessary for justice to be served.

Opponents of the class action lawsuits argue that pharmaceutical companies provide a vital service by developing and producing safe, effective medications to treat a variety of medical conditions. While attempting to regulate drug prices is admirable, any changes must be managed carefully to ensure the continued availability of necessary medications. Moreover, it has been suggested that the actions of wholesalers, pharmacy benefit managers, and state regulations have had a greater impact on drug pricing than manufacturers.

As the debate over artificial tears medication continues, it is especially important to consider all aspects of the problem before any concrete policy decisions can be made. Despite sincere intentions on both sides of the argument, finding balance between fairness and access will be paramount if meaningful intervention is to occur. Ultimately, understanding each side’s perspective is key in order to craft effective solutions that provide lasting benefits for all stakeholders involved. Looking ahead, with the right approach it may be possible to create accommodating policies that offer consumers the necessary relief while maintaining fair competition within the marketplace.

The evidence and evaluation surrounding this contentious issue has long been public knowledge but due to significant aspects outside of human control – such as rising research costs and government regulations – many continue to grapple with ways in which policy changes can best benefit everyone involved. As we move forward, further exploration into potential litigation options could pave the way for creative resolutions that limit damages for all parties whilst also serving justice in a firm yet reasonable manner.

Types of Lawsuits Filed Over Artificial Tears Drug

There have been numerous lawsuits filed. In most of these cases, the individual(s) bringing forth the claim are seeking compensation and justice in response to the alleged harm caused using artificial tears products. Whether individuals, or their legal representatives, many have leveled allegations such as negligence, design defect, fraudulent misrepresentation, and failure to adequately warn against the potential side effects associated with the administration of the artificial tears drugs.

On one hand, lawyers and claimants argue that patients were never informed about potentially adverse reactions from using these drugs. Supporters of this argument point to evidence such as patient testimonials and regulatory documents which appear to corroborate this narrative.

Yet, on the other hand, attorneys representing pharmaceutical giants have pushed back on these claims noting that they employed reasonable efforts in informing patients as much as possible before administrating this drug. This is evidenced by multiple clinical trials regarding their products which tested side effects prior to its release. Their stance is that warning labels were clear and precise while they continued to update with new information when possible and necessary.

Overall, those looking to seek justice over the negative impacts caused by artificial tears drugs have gone through both channels both filing class action lawsuits but also putting forward individual suits for further remedy. With both sides now undoubtedly aware of the grievances being voiced, it remains uncertain how this matter will play out in courts nationwide as we transition and take a closer look at exactly what kind of claims are being made by those affected directly by these drugs.

There have been numerous class action and individual lawsuits filed against global pharmaceutical companies for their artificial tears drugs. Patients allege negligence, design defects, fraudulent misrepresentation, failure to warn of potential side effects, and lack of informed consent. On the other hand, lawyers for the pharmaceutical companies argue that warnings were clear and precise and that clinical trials had tested side effects prior to release. It remains uncertain how this matter will play out in courts as claims are assessed.

Claims Made by Patients Over Artificial Tears Medication

When it comes to the claims made by patients over artificial tears medication, the opinions vary greatly depending on the particulars of each case. Those in favor of these lawsuits cite the fact that certain products were sold negligently or recklessly despite a lack of evidence to support their safety, while those against them argue that no two individuals will suffer the same fate and that some of these cases are baseless accusations meant to bring down large pharmaceutical companies.

While it is true that everyone’s experience will be different when it comes to taking these medications, there have also been many documented examples of serious side effects and even deaths stemming from the use of artificial tears like Refresh Tears, Moisture Drops, and Systane Ultra. With this in mind, it is important for those suing to ensure that they have credible evidence backing up their claim so that their case can stand up in court. Whether this evidence is presented in the form of expert witness testimony or through documents outlining a company’s failures and/or negligence, without it these claims will be difficult to prove.

The debate surrounding artificial tears lawsuits against global pharma continues as more and more people come out with horror stories from using them. As alternative forms of medication continue to become available, those on both sides of this issue will need to assess whether there is enough proof linking these products to the ailments reported by patients before making any judgments either way. Ultimately, only time will tell if justice will be served in these cases as potential side effects from artificial tears medications remain unclear, leaving us all wondering what exactly could happen next.

Potential Side Effects from Artificial Tears Medication

While many patients have made claims over the use of artificial tears medication from Global Pharma, it is important to look into potential side effects of the drug. In recent studies, it has been found that there may be a high risk of dry eye symptoms and itching with prolonged use of artificial tears. Further research has suggested that certain kinds of tears replacements might actually cause burning eyes and inflammation, as well as inflammation in some parts of the eye.

In addition to these physical reactions, patients have also reported feelings of anxiety linked to their usage of artificial tears. This could be due to some ingredients contained in certain products, such as preservatives, which can cause high levels of stress in sensitive individuals. One study even found that people who had taken artificial tears vision drops experienced an uncomfortable sensation or pounding heartbeat immediately afterwards.

It is important to bear in mind that not all cases will lead to side effects; individual cases vary greatly and may be dependent on several factors such as age, medical conditions, and product composition. So far, no one-size-fits-all solutions have been proposed for the issue at hand. In fact, it’s worth noting that alongside potential risks from using these drugs from Global Pharma, there are still plenty of success stories from users who found relief from their symptoms with artificial tear medications. Thus, discussing these side effects should remain an ongoing effort for doctors when considering the usage of artificial tear medications with patients.

No matter what the outcome was for tear drops treatments so far, it’s clear that understanding and recognizing the potential injuries associated with this medication is necessary. It’s time we uncover any short-term or long-term implications they have had on patients so we can accurately assess their impact on justice within the pharmaceutical industry.

Injuries from the Use of the Drug

The potential side effects of artificial tears medications can range from mild to serious. Unfortunately, some patients have experienced painful and even permanent injuries as a result of using these medications. These injury complaints range from inflammation of the eyes, vision loss, blurry vision, hazy vision, red and burning eyes to irritation, edema, allergic reactions, and even corneal erosion or ulcers. The most commonly reported injury is a decrease in vision that is not fully reversible after discontinuing the medication.

This issue is of particular concern for contact lens wearers who use artificial tears medications to manage discomfort. In some cases, long-term use of this drug can increase their risk for complications such as acute red eye, keratitis and other forms of corneal pathology. Some advocates have argued that global pharma has failed to sufficiently communicate the risks associated with the drug to consumers so they must be held accountable for any harm they cause while opponents feel that adequate warnings were provided and it was up to the consumer to take responsibility for their own health and safety.

Regardless of which position one may take on this issue, there is no denying that consumers who have suffered injuries due to the use of artificial tears medications should be compensated for their pain and suffering if it was caused by negligent corporate behavior.

Legal Options for Victims of Artificial Tears Medication

Those wishing to pursue such a case will likely need to present proof of an injury that can be attributed to their consumption of the artificial tears medication. A medical professional can also weigh in and offer an opinion concerning whether the plaintiffs were indeed injured by using the eyedrops. Furthermore, other evidence like documentation of purchase, documentation of doctor visits, hospital bills and official medical records will be important for proving fault on behalf of the defendant(s).

Defendants may look to discredit any evidence put forward by victims seeking compensation. They may accuse those making claims of failing to properly follow dosing instructions or wildly exaggerating symptoms. In many cases, however, direct scientific evidence has been compiled to show that defective products can cause dangerous side-effects even when used correctly. One example is a study conducted by researchers at Johns Hopkins which found that one variety of artificial tears was shown in laboratory tests to cause damage to human cells. Such scientific findings can be extremely powerful ammunition for plaintiffs looking to win a lawsuit against pharmaceutical companies responsible for defective drugs.

In conclusion, while each victim’s situation is unique, there are a number of viable legal options available for those who have suffered injuries related to the consumption of artificial tears medications. Strict standards exist under precedent that must be adhered to in order for a successful lawsuit to be presented and likely will require expert testimony and scientific evidence depending on the nature of the case. Nonetheless, justice can still be sought if proper attention is given throughout each stage of litigation.

Nationwide Legal Representation

INDIVIDUAL CASES, INDIVIDUAL ATTENTION
  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.
  • By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your request & other information using automated technology. Message frequency varies. Msg & data rates may apply. Text STOP to cancel. Acceptable Use Policy
Locations (By Appt. Only)
  • Houston, TX - Principal Office
    2905 Sackett St.
    Houston, TX 77098
    Map & Directions
  • New York, NY
  • Salinas, CA
Follow Us